Previous parts: Response to Several Criticisms It is said: “If Pohantoon (University) truly is a center for promoting knowledge and technology for all, it is admirable and precious. But if my “Danishgah” (university) and yours become centers for promoting sinister fundamentalism and divisive ideology, I detest such universities.” This argument appears quite benevolent on the surface, suggesting the arguer has delved deeper into the heart of the matter than you have.
Yet, upon closer scrutiny and with more conscientious doubt, we realize the claimant is attempting a roguish defense by using the term “Pohantoon” instead of “Danishgah”. In the first part of this writing, we were reminded how soft chauvinism has appeared in wolf’s clothing, presenting itself as more tender than a mother, even as it follows the same path as hard chauvinism. The discussion of the influence of Islamic fundamentalism in universities has nothing to do with the language issue and is simply raised to confuse the opposition.
If the liberals, who claim to advocate for democracy and human rights, and the leftists, who claim to fight for equality and “class struggle,” had not been engaged in betrayal, theft, corruption, and NGO-ism during the twenty-year military presence of Western countries led by the United States in Afghanistan, universities would not have fallen under the control of extremist Islamic groups, and the country would not have been handed over to terrorists. If chauvin.
